We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 10 examines the recent mass tort litigation pursued on public nuisance grounds and modeled after the succesful opioid public nuisance litigation. After the 1999 Master Settlement Agreement with the tobacco company defendants, the tobacco companies ceased marketing cigarettes and tobacco products; cigarette smoking dropped precipitously thoughout the United States. In 2006 JUUL introduced e-cigarette vaping products and marketed these extensively to school-aged youth. This marketing program resulted in massive e-cigarette use by students, which precipitated a crisis among school districts and muncipalities having to deal with vaping in schools. Plaintiffs attorneys, allied with school districts and muncipalities, instituted massive litigation throughout the country. Modeled on the opioid litigation, federal e-cigarette litigation was consoldated in an MDL in the Northern District of California. This chapter chronicles the development and resolution of the e-cigarette public nuisance litigation, resulting in one bellwether trial and ultimately numerous settelements with JUUL and Altria, extending through 2023. The case study illustrates that a public nuisance claim may induce defendants to settle.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.