We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Trump administration proposed to open drilling in the Atlantic and the Pacific and parts of the Arctic Coast where little to no drilling has occurred. It proposed to open more offshore areas to drilling despite the dangers posed to coastal economies and the fact that companies have drilled on only one-fifth of the 28 million acres already leased offshore. Congress abandoned its decades-long protection of the coastal region of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, opening that pristine region, with only limited oil reserves, to drilling. The administration held a fire sale of leases offshore, costing the American public a potential fortune in terms of revenue while foreclosing other options for the use of public seas during the lease period. Not surprisingly, a number of state governments, some in the hands of Republicans, challenged drilling in federal waters off their coasts. Fears that offshore drilling might doom their election chances motivated the vast majority of Republican congressional representatives to request exemptions from Trump for their individual states. They chose not to exercise united congressional power to check the president’s actions, declining to support legislation that would have protected all states located on the Atlantic and the Pacific coasts.
The expansion of offshore drilling to deeper waters in the Gulf of Mexico and to more remote waters in the Arctic, as well as more intense hurricanes induced by climate change, have heightened risks of major well blowouts and oil spills. The Trump administration worsened these risks by rolling back regulations that had been enacted in response to the 2010 BP oil spill, the largest unintentional spill in the world (as of 2020), and to near misses during the 2013 Shell Arctic expedition. These rollbacks, plus poor government oversight of companies and scant attention to companies’ safety culture, risk a repeat of past oil spill disasters that devastated coastal communities. Members of the bipartisan commission that had investigated the spill reiterated its warnings in 2020 that another major oil spill is simply a matter of time and called for stronger laws governing offshore drilling. A number of congressional members did propose legislation to improve safety in offshore drilling. Unfortunately, despite the shifting tide against offshore drilling in coastal states, the majority of Republicans and those Democrats from states reliant on oil extraction failed to support these initiatives, putting at risk Americans’ lives, livelihoods, coasts and oceans.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.