We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter traces the long legal journey towards the recognition of advance directives (ADs) in India and contextualises these within the initial obstacles as well as the mitigating forces. The issues span the legalisation of passive euthanasia, the decriminalisation of attempted suicide and the eventual recognition of the right to privacy in India in 2017, as well as the development of psychiatric advance directives under the Mental Healthcare Act 2017. These developments culminated in the guidelines of the Supreme Court of India in the case of Common Cause v. Union of India in March 2018, which contain complex and lengthy procedures and requirements. We argue that the issues arising through these developments, as well as a number of cultural and religious influences, need further review. In particular, we focus on the role of family in end-of-life decision-making, and argue that in the law commission reports as well as in court decisions, courts and medical professionals have been represented as protectors of the patients from their families. As far as the practice of ADs is concerned, we present our survey results, which demonstrate a lack of awareness regarding advance directives.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.