We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Technology developed in a predecessor paper (Chen and Seneta (1996)) is applied to provide, in a unified manner, a sharpening of bivariate Bonferroni-type bounds on P(v1≥r, v2≥u) obtained by Galambos and Lee (1992; upper bound) and Chen and Seneta (1986; lower bound).
In the paper we first show how to convert a generalized Bonferroni-type inequality into an estimation for the generating function of the number of occurring events, then we give estimates for the deviation of two discrete probability distributions in terms of the maximum distance between their generating functions over the interval [0, 1].
Let (A1A2, · ··, An) be a set of n events on a probability space. Let be the sum of the probabilities of all intersections of r events, and Mn the number of events in the set which occur. The classical Bonferroni inequalities provide upper and lower bounds for the probabilities P(Mn = m), and equal to partial sums of series of the form which give the exact probabilities. These inequalities have recently been extended by J. Galambos to give sharper bounds.
Here we present straightforward proofs of the Bonferroni inequalities, using indicator functions, and show how they lead naturally to new simple proofs of the Galambos inequalities.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.