Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 75 - Trends in postwar literature, 1945–1970s

  • from Part V - The modern period (1868 to present)
  • Edited by Haruo Shirane, Columbia University, New York, Tomi Suzuki, Columbia University, New York, David Lurie, Columbia University, New York
  • Book:
    The Cambridge History of Japanese Literature
    Published online:
    05 January 2016
    Print publication:
    17 December 2015, pp 719-736

  • Summary

    The history of modern Japanese literature begins with translation in more than one sense. The Meiji era was characterized by calls for reform in virtually every arena of Japanese life; language and women were especially prominent targets for change. Futabatei Shimei was the first to attempt translating modern Western fiction into vernacular Japanese, and one of the first to try composing original fiction in vernacular Japanese. In translating vernacular Russian fiction, Futabatei abandoned the preexisting styles of kanbun-kundoku, instead seeking to forge a new style that would convey the form, content, and vernacular nature of the original texts. Osei is a talker and natural-born mimic, whereas Bunzo is a thinker who sees everything in terms of written texts. The ever-widening gap between the two, when read as the failed betrothal of speech and writing, emerges as a powerful metanarrative on the essential dilemmas of vernacularization in modern Japanese literature.