We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Christophe Boesch, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany,Roman Wittig, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Edited in association with
Catherine Crockford, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany,Linda Vigilant, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany,Tobias Deschner, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany,Fabian Leendertz
In humans, differences in voice quality influence sexual attraction and perceived dominance, but little is known about such mechanisms in Pan. Here, we investigated the degree of sexual dimorphism in chimpanzee vocalizations. We expected the sexes to differ in mean fundamental (F0) and peak frequencies (pF) according to the source filter theory, which predicts that differences in body size affect vocal characteristics. Using data from nine chimpanzees of the South Group, we analysed call rates and measured F0, pF and durations from pant–hoots and food calls. We also tested for sex differences in bout duration and the number of food grunts per bout. Males and females had equal rates of call production for all signals except pant–hoots and buttress-drumming, with males producing these significantly more often. Additionally, contrary to predictions based on body size, female food grunts were lower in dominant frequency bands and peak frequencies while males produced longer food-call bouts with a greater number of tonal grunts. Further analyses should address whether these sex differences in acoustic parameters could play a role in female choice and male competition in chimpanzees.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.