We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Why should we care about the reception of Darwin in France? We should care because it’s a fascinating case study of how science can sometimes take an unexpected path as it circulates through a society. The myth of the “conspiracy of silence” was born in the 1860s out of a seeming paradox. Although France was one of the first countries to support transformist theories, it was one of the last in Europe to recognize Darwin’s theory. The myth spread in the 1870s, when Darwin experienced his first rejection at the Academy of Sciences in Paris. According to this myth, not only did the French remain silent on Darwin’s thesis, but there was a conspiracy to nip in the bud any attempt to discuss evolution. In fact, while the debate was largely thwarted in elite scientific institutions, it was growing among the educated public. Public discussion was crucial to the spread of Darwin’s theory, even before the scientific establishment had embraced it. The introduction of Darwinism in France was not a failure. It simply took unusual paths. Indeed, it is usually assumed that the circulation of theories is top-down, that is, from scientific elites to the masses. Through the case of the circulation of Darwinism in France, this chapter aims to show a different pattern, one that restores to the public its role in the diffusion of scientific theories.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.