We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Measurement-Based Care (MBC) is an emerging healthcare model with a number of potential advantages over traditional approaches for the treatment of substance use disorder (SUD). Despite SUD treatment programs being theoretically well suited for the implementation of MBC, its uptake has been minimal, which in turn limits further research, knowledge synthesis, and translation into clinical practice.
Objectives
The goal of this knowledge synthesis project is to stimulate greater consideration of MBC models in addictions programs, with three interrelated objectives: 1. To summarize the existing evidence from research literature 2. To complement the literature findings with the data from our clinical research and quality improvement projects 3. To explore potential risks and difficulties of MBC implementation in the SUD treatment programs
Methods
Narrative review. Knowledge synthesis.
Results
To date, only two published randomized controlled trials, which along with the data from our pragmatic clinical research, support the wider implementation of MBC in the substance abuse treatment settings, but also indicate the high need for larger-scale clinical trials and quality improvement programs. Potential barriers to the implementation of MBC for SUD are outlined at the patient, provider, organization, and system levels, as well as challenges associated with the use of MBC programs for clinical research. Critical thinking considerations and risk mitigation strategies are offered toward advancing MBC for SUD beyond the current nascent state.
Conclusions
The state-of-the-art of MBC in SUD care settings reviewed and the strategies for further development from adminsitrative, clinical, and research prospectives outlined.
Both Major Depressive and Alcohol Use Disorders are highly prevalent. They also are the major contributors to disability and decreased quality of life and, as they are often comorbid with each other, the diagnosis and treatment of concurrent depression and alcohol use disorder represents a challenging task with multiple clinical questions requiring evidence-based recommendations.
Objectives
The goal of this presentation is to review the optimal strategies to treat concurrent alcohol use and major depressive disorders in the context of current research findings and clinical practice.
Methods
Narrative review, knowledge synthesis.
Results
The most up-to-date research findings in the areas of epidemiology of concurrent depression and alcohol use disorder, their differential diagnosis, and treatment approaches will be reviewed. This review will include the current evidence of effectiveness of various antidepressants in treatment of depression concurrent with alcohol use disorder and antidipsotropic agents use for alcohol use disorder in the context of depressive symptoms, as well as their combinations. We will discuss the timeline of initiation of both antidepressants and antidipsotropic agents, non-pharmacological treatment modalities as well as the clinical tools that can be used to properly monitor patients’ progress and optimize the treatment process, and the integrative teamwork necessary to achieve optimal results.
Conclusions
Ultimately, the optimal diagnostic and treatment algorithm and the set of evidence-based treatment recommendations will be presented.
Disclosure
No significant relationships.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.