Blooms of the harmful alga Dinophysis acuminata, which produces okadaic acid (OA), are becoming recurrent in Santa Catarina coast, where most of the shellfish marine farms in Brazil are located. We evaluated the impact of D. acuminata blooms on various haemato-immunological parameters and on tissue integrity of cultivated oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and mussels (Perna perna). Animals were sampled during two natural algal blooms, one at Praia Alegre (PA: 2950 cells l−1) and the other at Praia de Zimbros (PZ: 4150 cells l−1). Control animals were sampled at the same sites, 30 days after the end of the bloom. The assayed parameters were: total (THC) and differential (DHC) haemocyte counts, percentage of apoptotic haemocytes (AH), phenoloxidase activity (PO), agglutinating titre (AT) and total protein concentration in haemolymph (PC). Histological analyses were carried out in oysters from PZ. The results showed that some immune parameters were modulated during the toxic blooms, but not in a consistent manner, especially in mussels that accumulated more OA (10×) than oysters. For example, mussel THC decreased significantly (54%) during the bloom at PA, whereas it augmented markedly (64%) at PZ. PO activity was significantly altered by the algal blooms in both bivalve species, while PC increased significantly (66%) only in mussels from PZ bloom. The other parameters (DHC, AH and AT) did not vary in both bivalve species. Histological analyses showed an intense haemocytic infiltration throughout the oyster digestive epithelium, particularly into the stomach lumen during the algal bloom.

The identity of Dinophysis sacculus Stein has proved to be problematic in recent years, during which this species has been associated with diarrhoetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) events along European coasts. To complement the scarce and at times contradictory existing information, we provide details of morphological variation in D. sacculus throughout its geographical range, which includes the Mediterranean Sea and European Atlantic coasts. Our data clarify its relationship with D. pavillardii Schröder. This species differs from D. sacculus only by the presence of a concavity along the dorsal margin, but transitional morphotypes are frequent in almost all the samples examined. We therefore propose merging the two species and classifying morphotypes with a dorsal concavity as D. sacculus f. reniformis (Pavillard) comb. nov. Despite the high variability of Dinophysis sacculus, it was generally possible to separate it from D. acuminata Claparède & Lachmann. The only character distinguishing the two species is the shape of the large hypothecal plates, which in D. sacculus are elongate, almost rectangular or sac-like, whereas in D. acuminata they are shorter, more convex dorsally and often more slender towards the antapex. Thecal areolation and sulcal list ornamentation are more pronounced in D. acuminata, although these characters are somewhat variable. Other thecal details, such as the shape of sulcal platelets and the structure of the apical pore area, were not useful for circumscription of the two taxa. In a few samples from the Galician Rias and from the Spanish Mediterranean coast, we observed morphotypes intermediate between D. sacculus and D. acuminata, which indicates that the two species can have slightly overlapping ranges of variability.