We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter examines Sa’dallah Wannous’ use and interrogation of history as means of carving out a space for critical reflection on pressing contemporary issues such as state violence. It focuses on two of Wannous’ late plays, Historical Miniatures and Drunken Days and argues that Wannous’s highly literary dramatic language consistently interrogates history and tradition. The chapter also includes an analysis of two significant productions of Historical Miniatures, one in Beirut in 2000, staged by the renowned Lebanese director Nidal al Achkar, and the other a daring site-specific production in the prison area of the actual thirteenth-century citadel in Damascus where the play is set, by Syrian director Naila Al-Atrash, which was staged shortly after Wannous’ death in 1997. Since the citadel had been used to house political prisoners during the early years of the regime of Hafez al-Assad, who died three years later, Al-Atrash’s production was inevitably interpreted as a pointed critique of the Syrian state’s continuing use of violence and incarceration as means of suppressing dissent.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.