We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A universal basic income is widely endorsed as a critical feature of effective governance. It is also growing in popularity in an era of substantial collective wealth alongside growing inequality. But how could it work? Current economic policies necessarily influence wealth distributions, but they are often sufficiently complicated that they hide their inefficiencies. Simplifications based on network science can offer plausible solutions and even offer ways to base universal basic income on merit. Here we will examine a case study based on a universal basic income for researchers. This is an important case because numerous funding agencies currently require costly proposal processes with high administrative costs. These are costly for the proposal writers, their evaluators, and the progress of science itself. Moreover, the outcomes are known to be biased and inefficiently managed. Network science can help us redesign funding allocations in a less costly and potentially more equitable way.
Words, like biological species, are born and then, someday, they die. The half-life of a word is roughly 2,000 years, meaning that in that interval about half of all words are replaced with an unrelated (noncognate) word. Where do the new words come from? There are numerous dimensions along which new words could vary from old words, so it may not be easy to see how to enter this problem. However, extending our small worlds metaphor and the observation of clusters in language, we tell a simple story that mirrors biological theories about the origin of species. Language has urban centers with well-populated and well-connected meanings (like *food* and *red*). It also has rural fringes, where words live more isolated lives as hermits with limited connections to other words (like *twang* and *ohm*). Are new words more likely to be born in urban centers or in the rural fringes?
The high technical barrier to entry in the field of neuroimaging can hinder early insight from promising results and the development of evidence-based clinical practice.
Objectives
The working group focused on published literature in order to develop a new methodology in the analysis, visualization, and representation of fMRI data in the psychiatric setting.
Methods
Three valid and established measures were chosen, in order to achieve dimensionality reduction, stability and explainability of results, namely Regional-Homogeneity; fractional Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations; Eigenvector-Centrality. Each measure was color coded and individual images per subject compiled, averaging results by functional networks as described the FIND lab of the University of Stanford. 272 individual scans were processed (130 neurotypicals, 50 patients with Schizophrenia, 49 with Bipolar Disorder, 43 with ADHD).
Results
The discriminative power between clinical groups of the novel method was significant both by human eye, and later confirmation by statistical tests, and by computer vision algorithms (Convolutional Neural Networks). The precision-recall Area Under the Curve, dividing by 80/20 proportion between train and test sets, was >84.5% for each group. The group of patients with Bipolar Disorder showed a partial overlap with the group of patients suffering from Schizophrenia – by a dominance of Eigenvector-Centrality and Regional-Homogeneity, as well as a lower prevalence of fractional Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations, for both in comparison to controls.
Conclusions
The present study offers preliminary evidence for the adoption of i-ECO (integrated-Explainability through Color Coding) in fMRI analyses during rest in the Psychiatric field.
One of the most perplexing and characteristic symptoms of the schizophrenia (SZ) patients is hallucination. The occurrence of hallucinations to be associated with altered activity in the auditory and visual cortex but is not well understood from the brain functional network dynamics in SZ.
Objectives
To explore the brain abnormal basis of hallucinations in SZ with the dynamic functional connectivity (dFC).
Methods
Using magnetic resonance imaging for 83 SZ patients and 83 matched healthy controls and independent component analysis, 52 independent components (ICs) were identified as nodes and assigned into eight intrinsic connectivity networks (Figure 1A). Subsequently, we established dFC matrices and clustered them into four discrete states (Figure 1B) and three state transition metrics were obtained. To further explore the changes in the centrality of each component, eigenvector centrality (EC) was calculated and its time-varying was evaluated.
Results
Compared to controls with FDR correction, we found that patients had more mean dwell times and fractional time in state 1 (P=0.0081 and P=0.0018), mainly with hypoconnectivity between auditory and visual network and other networks and hyperconnectivity between language and default-mode network (DMN). While, patients had less dwell times and fractional time in state 3 (P=0.0018 and P=0.0009), and decreased FC between visual network and executive control network (ECN) and increased FC between ECN and DMN than controls (Figure 2).
EC statistics showed that SZs displayed increased temporal dynamics in visual-related regions (Figure 3).
Conclusions
SZ was mainly manifested as altered dFC and temporal variability of nodal centrality in auditory and visual networks.
Disclosure
No significant relationships.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.