Background: Beliefs that it is unacceptable to experience or express negative emotions have been found to be associated with various clinical problems. It is unclear how such beliefs, which could be viewed as a form of unhelpful perfectionism about emotions, may contribute to symptomatology. Aims: This study investigated two hypotheses: a) greater endorsement of beliefs about the unacceptability of negative emotions will be associated with greater emotional avoidance and lower levels of support-seeking and self-compassion; b) these beliefs about emotions will be associated with higher levels of symptoms of depression, anxiety and fatigue and that this relationship will be mediated by social support-seeking, emotional avoidance and self-compassion. Method: Online questionnaires were completed by 451 community participants. Mediational analyses were undertaken to investigate emotional avoidance, social support-seeking and self-compassion as mediators of the relationship between beliefs about emotions and symptoms of depression, anxiety and fatigue. Results: Beliefs about the unacceptability of negative emotions were significantly associated with more emotional avoidance and less self-compassion and support-seeking. The relationships between beliefs about emotions and depression, anxiety and fatigue were significantly mediated by self-compassion and emotional avoidance but not social support-seeking. Conclusions: Future research should investigate whether interventions that pay particular attention to emotional avoidance and self-compassion, such as mindfulness-based therapy or modified forms of CBT, may be beneficial in reducing distress and fatigue associated with beliefs about the unacceptability of negative emotions.

Cognitive processes are considered integral to the conceptualisation of emotional disorders and distress. Contemporary models have emphasised the importance of individual differences in the interpretation of internal events, including emotions. Maladaptive beliefs about emotional experience may motivate unhelpful control strategies, and impact negatively on psychological wellbeing. Building on existing measures of emotion, an integrative scale was developed to assess a range of maladaptive beliefs about the experience of negative emotions. Psychometric evaluation provided preliminary support for the reliability and validity of the Affect Intolerance Scale (AIS). Furthermore, the scale demonstrated a unique relationship with clinical symptomatology (i.e., depression, anxiety, stress and worry) above and beyond existing measures assessing dimensions of emotional experience. Potential utility of the measure for clinical practice and avenues for future research are discussed.

This study considered the role of schema-level cognitive processes in alcohol and opiate abuse. It examined the hypothesis that alcohol abuse will be associated with the use of “blocking” behaviours to reduce the experience of emotions (secondary avoidance of affect), while opiate abuse will be associated with a tendency to avoid emotions being activated in the first place (primary avoidance of affect). The sample consisted of 30 patients who abused alcohol, and 30 who abused opiates. Each completed the Young Compensatory Inventory (YCI) and the Young-Rygh Avoidance Inventory (YRAI). There were no differences between the groups in their absolute levels of schema processes (YCI and YRAI scores). However, they differed in the way in which the severity of use was associated with the level of YRAI behavioural-somatic avoidance. Among alcohol abusers only, severity of use was greater in those who were more likely to avoid affective arousal in this way. This association with severity was not found among opiate abusers. Implications are discussed for existing treatments and for the use of schema-level cognitive behavioural interventions with substance-using populations.