We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter is devoted to the proof of two new characterizations of the WEP. This mostly consists of unpublished work due to the late Uffe Haagerup. Basically, the main point is as follows: consider an inclusion of a C*-algebra A into another (larger) one B. We wish to understand when there is a contractive projection from the bidual of B onto the bidual of A. From work presented earlier, we know that this holds if and only if the inclusion from A to B remains an inclusion if we tensorize it with any auxiliary C*-algebra C for the maximal tensor product. The main theorem of this chapter shows that actually a much weaker property suffices: it is enough to take for C the complex conjugate of A and we may restrict to « positive definite » tensors. The main case of interest is when B=B(H), in which case the property in question holds iff A has the WEP. Among the corollaries, one can prove that a von Neumann subalgebra of B(H) is injective as soon as there is a c.b. projection from B(H) onto it.
We review here the extension properties that are equivalent to the WEP. We take special care to clarify this topic because of some obscurity that we detected in Kirchberg’s original paper on this same topic. We also consider parallel lifting properties that express the LLP.
It is known that if a topological property of Tychonoff spaces is closed-hereditary, productive and possessed by all compact Hausdorff spaces, then each (0-dimensional) Tychonoff space X is a dense subspace of a (0-dimensional) Tychonoff space with such that each continuous map from X to a (0-dimensional) Tychonoff space with admits a continuous extension over . In response to Broverman's question [Canad. Math. Bull. 19 (1), (1976), 13–19], we prove that if for every two 0-dimensional Tychonoff spaces X and Y, if and only if , then is contained in countable compactness.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.