We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Seismic velocity is a very useful tool for pore pressure prediction prior to drilling a well. This chapter identifies various sources of velocity data - checkshot, VSP, well logs, laboratory, and seismic measurements. The goal is to obtain velocity variations in 3D that not only reflect the subsurface structures in depth but also convey the expected range of velocity variations that is compliant with rock physics principles, structural geology, and stratigraphy of formations and geopressure. This chapter discusses various ways to obtain velocity data for pore pressure analysis and points out how to establish a link between seismic traces that are recorded in "space and time" and the "space and depth" that are required by the drilling community. It stresses that the seismic model building step must deal with separating imaging velocity from the velocity that is close to rock velocity.
This chapter conjectures on some of the upcoming technologies and how they might impact pore pressure prediction in the future. It gives a schematic of a workflow that integrates basin modeling derived pore pressure to rock physics and seismic anisotropic velocity modeling and imaging, executed in a grand loop. Some recent applications of machine learning applied to pore pressure prediction are discussed. The chapter concludes that the future is almost here, and it is bright indeed!
This chapter discusses technologies that yield geologically plausible and physically possible interval velocities from surface seismic data. The workflow is termed RPGVM, rock physics guided velocity modeling. The approach can be used on any algorithm for interval velocity computations – be it conventional or based on inversions such as tomography and FWI. The goal is to define the parameter base associated with a particular inversion approach so that the inferred velocity model is constrained by rock physics and bounds of pore pressure. Applications from the Gulf of Mexico and offshore India are described. The chapter shows the value of rock physics templates for deriving velocity models with anisotropic tomography.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.