Search

Skip to main content Accessibility help

Home
Search

Only show content I have access to (1)

Articles (1)

Over 3 years (1)

From year:

To year:

Apply

Law (1)

flexible constitution

European Constitutional Law Review (1)

View selected items
Save to my bookmarks
Export citations
Download PDF (zip)
Save to Kindle
Save to Dropbox
Save to Google Drive
Save content to
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to .

To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
You are about to save
Your Kindle email address

Please provide your Kindle email.

@free.kindle.com @kindle.com (service fees apply)

By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services

1 results

Revision: Article IV-7 Draft Convention
Bruno de Witte
Journal:

European Constitutional Law Review / Volume 1 / Issue 1 / January 2005

Published online by Cambridge University Press:

12 October 2004, pp. 136-140
- Article
- - You have access
- PDF
- Export citation
Many proponents of the Constitutional Treaty admit that this document is far from perfect, indeed quite disappointing in many respects, but argue that the Treaty should be seen as a step in the long process of European integration rather than an end-point. It will be possible to learn from the failings of the new Treaty and correct them later on, just like this Treaty itself has corrected some of the mistakes, and fill in some of the blanks left by earlier Treaty revisions.