We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Christophe Boesch, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany,Roman Wittig, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Edited in association with
Catherine Crockford, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany,Linda Vigilant, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany,Tobias Deschner, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany,Fabian Leendertz
Despite appealing support for theories that argue that social complexity is the main force driving primate brain-size evolution, it is still unclear how great apes were able to afford the evolution of larger and more expensive brains than sympatric species. Comparative phylogenetic studies suggest that the costs of evolutionary brain enlargement were overcome by a permanent increase in net energy intake, renewing interest in the role of ecological complexity in primate brain-size evolution. As relatively larger-brained primates, like chimpanzees, show less seasonality in their net energy intake than smaller-brained species, larger brains are proposed to provide a ‘cognitive behavioural flexibility’ that facilitates the consumption of nutritious foods during periods of food scarcity (cognitive buffer hypothesis). To date, it remains unclear what this cognitive flexibility entails. In this chapter, I will provide evidence for a variety of mechanisms of temporal cognition that chimpanzees employ to gain first access to newly ripened, energy-rich fruit in a competitive and complex rainforest environment.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.