We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The chapter establishes Germanic as an Indo-European branch by identifying phonological and morphological innovations common to all Germanic languages, e.g. Rask/Grimm’s Law, Verner’s Law and the grammation of a complex verbal system with strong, weak and preterite-present verbs. Furthermore, the chapter identifies three Germanic sub-branches (East, North, West) and discusses the possibility of binary splits leading to intermediary subgroupings, of which either North-West or North-East Germanic seems credible depending on one’s view on Verschärfung. Alternatively, in a dialect continuum, North Germanic may have shared innovations with first East, then West Germanic prior to the final split. Finally, the chapter examines with which Indo-European branches Germanic shares non-trivial innovations and thus, maybe, a common node on the cladistic tree. Promising innovations shared with Italic and with Balto-Slavic (and Tocharian?) are considered in particular, but the sustained productivity of nominal ablaut and the preterite-presents calls for the conclusion that Germanic split off from Proto-Indo-European relatively early, as these features are mostly lost in the non-Anatolian branches.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.