We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To study individual determinants of differential benefit from the Senegal Community Nutrition Project (CNP) by monitoring improvement in children's weight-for-age index (WA) or underweight status (WA < –2 Z-scores) during participation.
Design
A follow-up study using the CNP child monitoring data. Linear general models compared variations in WA according to 14 factors describing the beneficiaries and CNP services.
Setting
Poor neighbourhoods of Diourbel, a large city in Senegal, West Africa. Over a 6-month period, the CNP provided underweight or nutritionally at-risk 6–35-month-old children with monthly growth monitoring and promotion and weekly food supplementation, provided that mothers attended weekly nutrition education sessions.
Subjects
All the children who participated in the first two years of the project (n = 4084).
Results
Mean WA varied from − 2.13 (standard deviation (SD) 0.82) to − 1.58 (SD 0.81) Z-scores between recruitment and the end of the follow-up. The lower the child's initial WA, the greater was their increase in WA but the lower was the probability of recovery from underweight. Only 61% of underweight children recovered. Six months of CNP services may not be sufficient for catch-up growth of severely underweight children. The number of food supplement rations received was not a direct indicator of the probability of recovery. After adjustment for services received and initial WA, probability of recovery was lower in girls, in younger children, in twins and when mothers belonged to a specific ethnic group.
Conclusions
Determinants of benefit from CNP differed from the risk factors for underweight. Identification of participants with a lower probability of recovery can help improve outcome. Moreover, an explanation for the lack of recovery could be that many underweight children are stunted but not necessarily wasted.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.