We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Research into the relationship between the subjective perception of clinical change and the objective evidence of the same is very limited. Less is known about the relationship between clinical judgments by mental health experts and the patient's perception of symptom change, in particular across different diagnostic groups.
Aims and objectives
This study aims to determine the level of concordance between the HONOS as a tool for clinical outcome monitoring and the self-reported change in psychopathology in a total sample of psychiatric patients as well as stratified by their primary diagnosis at admission.
Methods
A consecutive sample of patients admitted to a Swiss psychiatric hospital for either alcohol use disorders, schizophrenic psychoses, mood disorders, anxiety and somatoform disorders, or personality disorders, was assessed using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) at admission and at discharge. The HoNOS were rated by the responsible clinicians. Complete data of admission and discharge were available from approximately 600 cases. Reliable change index (RCI) will be calculated to determine a clinically meaningful change based on the HoNOS scores. Concordance of RCI and change in BSI scores will be explored and compared between different diagnostic groups.
Results and conclusions
According to our preliminary results from this ongoing evaluation program, we hope to provide a step towards a deeper understanding of the interrelationship between clinical judgments and the course of subjectively experienced mental health problems.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
In psychiatric practice, the assessment of change from pre- to post-treatment is a key approach for monitoring treatment effects and for the prediction of treatment outcomes. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) as a clinician-rated measure and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) as a self-report measure are tools (that are) often incorporated in outcome monitoring. Their usefulness, however, has been questioned by two important issues: their psychometric properties and their lack of concordance.
Aims and objectives
The aim of the study is to evaluate the responsiveness of HoNOS and BSI as well as their interactions to predict clinical meaningful change according to the Global Clinical Impression (CGI) as quasi-gold standard for treatment outcome.
Methods
A consecutive sample of patients admitted to a Swiss psychiatric hospital for either alcohol use disorders, schizophrenic psychoses, mood disorders, anxiety and somatoform disorders, or personality disorders was assessed with Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) at admission and discharge. The HoNOS and the CGI were rated by the responsible clinicians at admission and discharge. Ordinal logistic regressions will be conducted using the CGI categories as ordered categorical outcome. HoNOS and BSI scores as well as their interaction terms will be used as independent variables.
Results and conclusion
Complete data of admission and discharge is available from approximately 600 cases. Graphical presentations will illustrate the resulting associations.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
The Tower Hamlets Crisis House (voluntary sector), in partnership with the local home treatment team, offers a brief residential alternative to psychiatric hospital admission. Here, we review clinician-reported (Health of the Nation Outcome Scales; HoNOS) and patient-reported (DIALOG) outcome scores collected from successive admissions between June 2015 and December 2016, to assess the effectiveness of the service model. We identified 153 successive admissions, and of these, 85 (55.6%) and 91 (59.5%) patients completed both admission and discharge DIALOG and HoNOS questionnaires, respectively. We analysed ten out of twelve HoNOS domains and eight patient-reported outcome measure DIALOG domains.
Results
We found a statistically significant improvement in nine out of ten domains of HoNOS and three out of eight domains of DIALOG.
Clinical implications
A partnership between a home treatment team and crisis house can result in positive outcomes for patients, as determined by both clinicians and patients.
Declaration of interest
None.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.