We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 1 examines the motif of corpse treatment in the Iliad and Aeneid. The chapter sets a baseline for the motif by looking at these foundational works, with the intention of establishing a normative framework which will prove valuable for highlighting deviations from the norm in the treatment of corpses in imperial epic. The section on the Iliad demonstrates the basic pattern of corpse treatment in the poem by examining the aftermath of the deaths of Sarpedon, Patroclus, and Hector. The section closes with a discussion of Locrian Ajax’s abuse of Imbrius (Il. 13.201-5), a scene that problematizes the general picture of corpse treatment in the poem. The next section considers Virgil’s narrative strategies concerning the abuse of corpses in the Aeneid. While it is clear that Virgil departs from Homer in allowing a wider range of corpse abuse into his poem, in every case Virgil pulls back from describing it and blankets the abuse in narrative silence. The section offers a consideration of the civil war violence and corpse mistreatment from Marius and Sulla to Actium and the establishment of the principate, as a means of contextualizing some of the (silent) abuses contained within the Aeneid.
Wars and fighting are very prominent in the literature of classical antiquity. This chapter looks at literary sources about war and fighting and the problems of using them. It concentrates on three types of fighter: archers, women, slaves. The chapter deals with the interaction between military and non-military institutions: the relationship between the state and organized violence, and attitudes to that relationship as they are displayed in the literary sources, are topics of central importance to the ancient historiography of warfare. It explores why there is so much about war in ancient literature if war was not regarded as the natural, normal state of affairs. Homer's Iliad, with its nearly incessant fighting, might seem to provide a complete reply to any notion that war was viewed by Greeks as unnatural. The chapter ends with six suggestions for the resolution of the paradox of war.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.