We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A newly designed, humanitarian logistic system called Disaster Inventory Management System (DIMA) has been developed by the Taiwan Society of Disaster Medicine according to the structure of the Humanitarian Supply Management System (SUMA). The applicability is to be investigated.
Methods:
After the implementation of DIMA, standard education and training programs in six regional Emergency Operations Centers (rEOC) in Taiwan were organized. From July 2007 to April 2008 (Phase 1), a standardized, eight-hour logistics training program including DIMA application was completed among the staff of the six rEOCs in Taiwan. Four scenarios were provided to test the applicability of the DIMA system compared to the conventional logistics system of each rEOC. In Phase 2, the DIMA was applied to a rescue team from Taipei that was responding to the China Sichuan Earthquake that occurred on 12 May 2008.
Results:
The error rate of information for Phase 1 was approximately 3.5% (donor = 1%; consignment = 1%; ware houses = 1%; and central feedback = 0.5%), which was significandy lower than that of the information from the indi vidual logistics systems of the six rEOCs (12%, p <0.01). A five-point scoring system concerning the satisfaction obtained from 178 trainees revealed higher satisfaction of the DIMA in transparencies (92 ±10 points vs. 66 ±12 points, p <0.001) and accountability (93 ±8 points vs. 78 ±16 points; p <0.01) compared to the conventional methods. In phase 2, the error rate of information was about 2.4% (donor = 0.6%; consignment = 0.5%; warehouses = 0.8%; and central feedback 0.5%), which was significantly lower dian that of information by conventional logistics systems (8%, p <0.01).
Conclusions:
The DIMA system is a transparent and efficient humanitarian management system. More practice may reduce the error rate in the future.