Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 8 - Rethinking Humanitarian Disarmament

  • Treasa Dunworth, University of Auckland
  • Book:
    Humanitarian Disarmament
    Published online:
    07 August 2020
    Print publication:
    06 August 2020, pp 214-242

  • Summary

    This chapter engages with humanitarian disarmament as a concept, rather than examining its practice in any particular context. It explains and distils general critiques of humanitarianism and explores whether, and if so, to what extent, those critiques might apply in the context of humanitarian disarmament. Drawing on literature from philosophy, media studies, critical security studies and human rights, four critiques of humanitarianism are examined: the apolitical posturing of humanitarianism; humanitarianism’s complicity with militarism; humanitarianism’s imperative of action; and the way in which a humanitarian discourse sets up a ‘hierarchy of humanity’. In each instance, the chapter shows that the general critiques do have traction in the specific context of humanitarian disarmament. Nevertheless, a humanitarian discourse is not rejected outright as being a viable means by which to advance disarmament discourse. Rather, the conclusion is that humanitarianism is one possible discourse that can, and does, illuminate disarmament but that it brings its own complexities, blind spots and complexities.