National guidance recommends that relatives of people with dementia receive support to develop coping strategies. STrAtegies for RelaTives (START) is an evidence-based manualised intervention for delivery on a one-to-one basis by trained graduate psychologists to family carers of people with dementia. However, implementation of START in standard National Health Service (NHS) provision has proved difficult. We describe collaboration between a Talking Therapies service and a Memory Service to co-facilitate and run START as a group. We consider implementation outcomes according to RE-AIM domains showing: the collaboration reached higher number of carers than other implementation initiatives (reach); there was significant reduction in caregiver anxiety and a trend towards significant reduction in depression (effectiveness); feedback from service users and clinicians on the service model has been positive (adoption); delivery has been supported by the written and audio materials (implementation); and the initiative has sustained over five years, despite the COVID-19 pandemic and staff turnover (maintenance). Finally, we discuss implications and potential future development.

1. (1) To develop knowledge about the content of the STrAtegies for RelaTives (START) coping intervention for family carers of people with dementia.

2. (2) To understand the similarities between low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression, as provided by Psychological Wellbeing Practitioners (PWPs), and START psychoeducational content and skills exercises.

3. (3) To reflect on the rationale for group delivery of START.

4. (4) To consider the benefits of collaboration between Talking Therapies and Memory Services for implementing START.

The concept of Service Model Fidelity is considered as a parallel process to Treatment Fidelity in evidence-based psychological therapies. NHS Talking Therapies (formerly IAPT) aimed to increase access to an expanded, upskilled workforce on a national scale. This included systematic training, supervision and front-line service delivery, emphasising treatment fidelity to evidence-based interventions. A further feature of NHS Talking Therapies was modernising and restructuring of the health system that housed these trained practitioners. The term ‘service model fidelity’ (Cromarty, 2016) was coined to emphasise service modernisation aspects as a distinct entity. A definition of the latter is included. Examples of service model fidelity and of service model drift, are outlined to distinguish these from therapist drift. This links to past literature recommending changes in traditional mental health service design and emergent evidence from NHS Talking Therapies. The latter examines publicly available data identifying characteristics of service design, which appear to be predictors of enhanced clinical outcome. Challenges in modernising health systems are discussed and conclusions are made highlighting the crucial role of service model when delivering evidence-based therapies. Suggestions for further research into service configuration to improve experiences of service users are considered. This includes ongoing exploration of service design being more than a qualitative feature, and increasingly appearing as a key factor in enhanced clinical outcome.

1. (1) To identify service model fidelity as separate entity to treatment fidelity.

2. (2) To provide a clear definition of service model fidelity.

3. (3) To delineate therapist drift from service drift.

4. (4) To further examine the role of service model in delivering evidence-based interventions.

Psychological Wellbeing Practitioners (PWPs) are central to NHS Talking Therapies services for depression and anxiety (TTad; formerly ‘IAPT’). This workforce has been trained to deliver low-intensity treatments for mild to moderate depression and anxiety. In practice, PWPs routinely work with more complex clients, likely due to a combination of reasons. Over half of referrals experience concurrent personality difficulties, which are linked to poorer treatment outcomes, and PWPs describe feeling unskilled to work with these clients. This study aimed to develop and pilot a Continuing Professional Development workshop for PWPs about enhancing practice in the context of concurrent personality difficulties; and evaluate acceptability, feasibility and potential impacts on clinical skills and attitudes. This is an audit of routine feedback from a pilot of the workshop offered in a single TTad PWP workforce (n=139). The workshop was successfully developed and a series of five workshops were delivered to 74% of the PWP workforce. Feedback was overwhelmingly positive, and a majority of PWPs reported improved confidence in key skills covered during the workshop, and a positive attitude towards working with clients with personality difficulties after the workshop. PWPs described enhanced capability, opportunity and motivation to undertake work with this client group following the workshop. The workshop showed potential to improve PWP confidence and skill to support TTad clients in the context of personality difficulties, although it is not yet known if this translates to better treatment outcomes for clients. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

1. (1) Understand the feasibility of gathering feedback and outcome data of a Continuing Professional Development (CPD) workshop delivered in routine practice for PWPs.

2. (2) Understand PWP perspectives on attending a CPD workshop to support tailoring PWP treatments for depression and anxiety in the context of personality difficulties.

3. (3) Reflect on potential opportunity to enhance PWP treatments in the context of personality difficulties via brief training workshops.

4. (4) Consider how COM-B can be used to explore barriers and enablers to PWPs implementing new learning to their practice.

Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT) is a novel wellbeing and recovery-oriented psychological treatment for depression. A recent pilot trial run in a university clinic setting suggests ADepT has potential to be superior to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) at treating anhedonic depression in a NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression (NHS–TTad) context. Before proceeding to definitive trial in pragmatic settings, it is important to establish if therapists in routine NHS-TTad settings can be trained to deliver ADepT effectively and to assess therapist views on the feasibility and acceptability of ADepT in this context. A bespoke training and supervision pathway was developed (2-day workshop, four 2–hour skills classes, and 6 months of weekly supervision) and piloted with 11 experienced therapists working in a single NHS–TT service in Devon. Nine out of 11 therapists completed the placement, treating 24 clients with a primary presenting problem of depression; 21/24 completed a minimum adequate dose of therapy (≥8 sessions), with 17/24 (71%) showing reliable improvement and 12/24 (50%) exhibiting reliable recovery. Eight out of nine therapists submitted a session for competency assessment, all of whom were rated as competent. Nine therapists submitted feedback on their experiences of training. Eight out of nine therapists felt the ADepT model would be effective in an NHS–TTad context; that training was interesting, useful, well presented and enhanced their own wellbeing; and that they felt sufficiently skilled in core ADepT competencies at the end of the placement. This suggests that NHS–TTad therapists can be trained to deliver ADepT competently and view the treatment as feasible and acceptable.

1. (1) To become familiar with the Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT) approach for enhancing wellbeing in depression.

2. (2) To evaluate the potential utility and feasibility of ADepT model in NHS Talking Therapies Services (NHS–TTad).

3. (3) To understand the pilot ADepT training and supervision pathway for CBT therapists in NHS–TTad services.

4. (4) To consider the opportunities and challenges of training therapists to deliver ADepT in NHS–TTad services.

Despite the importance of assessing the quality with which low-intensity (LI) group psychoeducational interventions are delivered, no measure of treatment integrity (TI) has been developed.

To develop a psychometrically robust TI measure for LI psychoeducational group interventions.

This study had two phases. Firstly, the group psychoeducation treatment integrity measure-expert rater (GPTIM-ER) and a detailed scoring manual were developed. This was piloted by n=5 expert raters rating the same LI group session; n=6 expert raters then assessed content validity. Secondly, 10 group psychoeducational sessions drawn from routine practice were then rated by n=8 expert raters using the GPTIM-ER; n=9 patients also rated the quality of the group sessions using a sister version (i.e. GPTIM-P) and clinical and service outcome data were drawn from the LI groups assessed.

The GPTIM-ER had excellent internal reliability, good test–retest reliability, but poor inter-rater reliability. The GPTIM-ER had excellent content validity, construct validity, formed a single factor scale and had reasonable predictive validity.

The GPTIM-ER has promising, but not complete, psychometric properties. The low inter-rater reliability scores between expert raters are the main ongoing concern and so further development and testing is required in future well-constructed studies.

There is some initial evidence that attachment security priming may be useful for promoting engagement in therapy and improving clinical outcomes.

This study sought to assess whether outcomes for behavioural activation delivered in routine care could be enhanced via the addition of attachment security priming.

This was a pragmatic two-arm feasibility and pilot additive randomised control trial. Participants were recruited with depression deemed suitable for a behavioural activation intervention at Step 2 of a Talking Therapies for Anxiety and Depression service. Ten psychological wellbeing practitioners were trained in implementing attachment security priming. Study participants were randomised to either behavioural activation (BA) or BA plus an attachment prime. The diagrammatic prime was integrated into the depression workbook. Feasibility outcomes were training satisfaction, recruitment, willingness to participate and study attrition rates. Pilot outcomes were comparisons of clinical outcomes, attendance, drop-out and stepping-up rates.

All practitioners recruited to the study, and training satisfaction was high. Of the 39 patients that were assessed for eligibility, 24 were randomised (61.53%) and there were no study drop-outs. No significant differences were found between the arms with regards to drop-out, attendance, stepping-up or clinical outcomes.

Further controlled research regarding the utility of attachment security priming is warranted in larger studies that utilise manipulation checks and monitor intervention adherence.

Large numbers of people showing complex presentations of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the NHS Talking Therapies services routinely require multi-faceted and extended one-to-one National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommended treatment approaches. This can lead to longer waits for therapy and prolong patient suffering. We therefore evaluated whether a group stabilisation intervention delivered to patients on the waitlist for individual trauma-focused psychological treatment could help address this burden.

The study aimed to ascertain a trauma-focused stabilisation group’s acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary clinical benefit.

Fifty-eight patients with PTSD waiting for trauma-focused individual treatment were included in the study. Two therapists delivered six 5-session groups. The stabilisation group was found to be feasible and acceptable. Overall, PTSD symptom reduction was medium to large, with a Cohen’s d of .77 for intent-to-treat and 1.05 for per protocol analyses. Additionally, for depression and anxiety, there was minimal symptom deterioration.

The study provided preliminary evidence for the acceptability, feasibility and clinical benefit of attending a psychoeducational group therapy whilst waiting for one-to-one trauma therapy.

1. (1) To understand current training provision of sexual orientation training across NHS Talking Therapies courses and services in England.

2. (2) To consider clinicians’ experiences of challenges and barriers that may prevent them from accessing or implementing sexual orientation training in clinical practice.

3. (3) To understand clinicians’ views of the current gaps in training and ways to improve training provision.

4. (4) To make recommendations to NHS Talking Therapies for Anxiety and Depression courses and services in ways to improve training on sexual orientation to better meet the learning needs of clinicians and service users.

Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) is an evidenced based treatment model for chronically depressed patients.

The main aim of this service evaluation was to assess the acceptability and clinical impact of CBASP for chronic depression within an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service.

Routinely collected data were analysed for all patients that received CBASP treatment focussing on the recovery rates of these patients in terms of depression, anxiety and social functioning. Interviews were conducted with patients who had recently been discharged from CBASP therapist within one month of the follow-up date, explore their experiences of therapy.

Outcome data for 27 patients suggested substantial reduction in scoring on measures of depression and anxiety following CBASP treatment. Across all interviews it was clear that patients developed an insight and understanding of how their behaviours affect the outcome of interpersonal situations.

Results from this service evaluation suggest that CBASP is acceptable to service users and has a positive clinical impact in terms of IAPT recovery targets for anxiety, depression and social functioning.