We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 3 begins with an examination of how anticommunism manifested in Mexico, Guatemala, and Uruguay, highlighting the importance of the National Security Doctrine and the notion of internal enemy, and analyzing the secret police files of Octavio Paz, Frida Kahlo, and Elena Poniatowska, and others, as illustrations of anticommunist paranoia. The examination of anticommunism culminates with analysis of Miguel Ángel Asturias’s collection of stories Week-end in Guatemala and its references to the 1954 coup d’état. The chapter then turns to the Cultural Cold War, using declassified documents from the CIA, to examine the organization of the Continental Cultural Congress (Santiago, 1953), with emphasis on the counter-maneuvering led by the American Embassy in Chile and Pablo Neruda’s role as one of the organizers of the Congress. Finally, it discusses Neruda’s “non-political” poetry at the time, The Captain’s Verses, vis-à-vis his “political” poetry.
The Great War, as it began to be called as early as 1915, was a traumatic event in the life of everyone who lived through it. Industrial warfare fundamentally changed the experience of combat. In the midst of battle, physical violence fused with moral suffering. Mass death reversed the normal succession of generations. War crimes and genocides were committed against enemy civilians. The First World War was also a war of words and images. The new “cultures of war” served both to stigmatize enemies (external and internal) and to mobilize the home fronts. Yet this cultural mobilization did not remain unchanged throughout the war: the initial mobilization in 1914-1915 was followed by a process of disengagement, and later by a form of remobilization at the end of the conflict. Finally, the First World War did not end without a feeling of profound anxiety over the future of millions of veterans, who had experienced mass death and extreme violence on the battlefields. The question of violence is at the core of a new historiography studying the boundaries between war and peace, the legacies of the Great War in a global context and the “brutalization” of post-war politics.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.