Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 1.1 - Cognitive Theories of Crime

  • from Part I - Psychological Underpinnings
  • Edited by Jennifer M. Brown, London School of Economics and Political Science, Miranda A. H. Horvath
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology
    Published online:
    02 December 2021
    Print publication:
    09 December 2021, pp 19-34

  • Summary

    The application of cognitive theories to criminal behaviour has moved through various stages. Sutherland’s Differential Association Theory (1930s/40s) introduced the notion of cognitions (definitions in the theory) as a factor in explaining crime. Following Skinner’s operant learning, Bandura’s social learning theory (1960s/70s) emphasised the role of cognition acquiring and maintaining behaviour, including criminal behaviour. In the 1980s social information processing articulated the sequence of encoding social cues, interpretation of cues, clarification of response goals, response access or construction, response decision and behavioural response. These cognitive processes may be affected by the individual’s emotional state, particularly anger in crimes of interpersonal violence. The 1980s also gave the view of the criminal as a rational decision-maker prepared to seize an opportunity to offend. The theories have given two contrasting approaches to crime reduction: (i) change offenders’ thinking and values; (ii) remove the opportunity for crime through situational crime prevention.