We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter explores the relationship between medicine and the novel in the long eighteenth century through a reading of the work of medical authority and novelist Jane Barker. Emphasising the rich interplay between eighteenth-century medicine and the novel, I begin with a review of criticism that considers novelistic representations of the body–mind relationship, sensibility, nerve theory, illness, disease as metaphor, and disability. I go on to suggest that Jane Barker deserves a place in the critical discussion of the relationship between the origins of the novel and the world of medicine. She was an innovator, both in her use of fiction to purvey medical knowledge and in her manipulation of such knowledge to narrative ends. In her novel Love Intrigues (1713), Barker displays her familiarity with the most modern and supposedly advanced medical wisdom, and rewrites and challenges such wisdom, sometimes drawing on older, humoural understandings of the body. Barker’s characterisation of her protagonist Galesia is evidence of a nascent psychological realism that effectively captures the heroine’s mental landscape – an effect achieved in part through her curious management of discourses of hysteria.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.