Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • Shunning from the Jehovah’s Witness Community: Is It Legal?

  • Windy A. Grendele, Maya Flax, Savin Bapir-Tardy
  • Journal:
    Journal of Law and Religion / Volume 38 / Issue 2 / May 2023
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    22 August 2023, pp. 290-313
    Print publication:
    May 2023
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Drawing on a qualitative study conducted with both individuals who have been shunned from the Jehovah’s Witnesses community and those who were in a position to shun others, the authors identify areas of development within the Serious Crime Act 2015 and propose that there is scope to interpret the law broadly to include instances of people shunned from the Jehovah’s Witnesses community.

  • Chapter 41 - The Jehovah’s Witnesses and First Amendment Theories

  • from Section B: Civil Liberties after 1937
  • Mark V. Tushnet, Harvard Law School, Massachusetts
  • Book:
    The Hughes Court
    Published online:
    13 January 2022
    Print publication:
    03 February 2022, pp 1116-1141

  • Summary

    The Jehovah’s Witnesses were regular litigants in the Hughes Court because they entirely denied the authority of government over their religious activities, and because their activiites routinely provoked intense controversy where they tried to proselytize. Their record in the Supreme Court was mixed, though overall they probably came out of the Supreme Court in a better position than they had been in before. But, in the Court’s most important decision dealing with the sect, the Court upheld controversial programs requiring that all students salute the US flag, including students who had religious objections to the practice. That decision, strongly criticized from the moment it was handed down, was soon repudiated, though only after Hughes had retired.