This chapter enlarges on the unique properites of Britishness as a global civic idea. It considers the meaning of ‘Greater Britain’ on the eve of the Great War, asking what kind of intercommunal network was enlivened by the conception of the British as a ‘world’ people. Contemporaries furnished a wide spectrum of answers, and it is by comparing the extremes of variation from Vancouver to Ulster to Punjab that the underlying dissonance between rival conceptions of Britishness emerge into view.

In 2017, Canada’s Stratford Festival dramatized The Komagata Maru Incident, Sharon Pollock’s play about Canada’s insistence on returning the ship Komagata Maru (KGM) and its passengers to India after it arrived in Vancouver in 1914. This chapter analyzes Pollock’s and Ajmer Rode’s plays about the KGM to examine, within a comparative framework, their differentiated investments in remembering this landmark moment in Canadian history. While Pollock’s play revisits the KGM to critique Canada’s treatment of its minorities, Rode’s play foregrounds the incident to comment on Canadian law in relation to British imperial interests in India, and the historical and ongoing regulation of national borders. Thus, while both plays challenge the official version of the KGM, Rode’s play situates the incident within a broader global history of empire as opposed to Pollock’s national focus on immigration and social exclusion. Nevertheless, by remembering the KGM from the space of time and distance, both plays provide frameworks for investigating colonial policies and attitudes, and for understanding the critical significance of Gurdit Singh’s first-hand account in Voyage of Komagata Maru or India’s Slavery Abroad. By refusing to forget the compelling story of the Komagata Maru journey, the plays function as powerful sites of historical commemoration.