We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In the 1940s and early 1950s, the Cold War convention of containment, which undergirded American involvement in Vietnam, was broadly shared, internalized, at times even fostered, by the United States European allies. This consensus broke down by the 1960s, as successive US administrations saw themselves locked ever more rigidly into Cold War logic which seemed to require going to war to preserve a noncommunist South Vietnam. By contrast, the United States transatlantic allies and partners increasingly came to question the very rationale of US intervention. By the mid-1960s there was a remarkable consensus among government officials across Western Europe on the futility of the central objective of the American intervention in Vietnam of defending and stabilizing a noncommunist (South) Vietnam. European governments refused to send troops to Vietnam. However, West European governments differed considerably in the public attitude they displayed toward US involvement in Vietnam, ranging from France’s vocal opposition to strong if not limitless public support by the British and West German governments. Across Western Europe, the Vietnam War cut deeply into West European domestic politics, aggravated political and societal tensions and diminished the righteousness of the American cause.
This chapter explores how the dawn of the nuclear age introduced new ways of thinking about environmental risks and children. Fears of radiation pollution set new terms and new meanings that precarious youth helped to make more concrete. The chapter emphasizes how concerns for youth and ecology moved together, driving the work of federal and citizen scientists who traced the paths of radioactive isotopes at different scales. Through the bodies of children at ever-increasing distances, Americans came to understand a new set of shared environmental risks. By concentrating the local and global releases of radioisotopes in their thyroid glands, blood, and bones, children drew together pollution and fears that could no longer be kept secret or separate from the relative safety of white middle-class domestic life. To postwar Americans, radiation was vague, invisible, and hopefully distant. How it insinuated itself – as metaphor and material experience – at the youthful heart of the postwar domestic dream helps to explain the power of the postwar popular ecology movement.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.