The incomplete miscibility of Al into the ferrihydrite structure has been a recurring issue in understanding the environmental geochemistry of this important oxyhydroxide. During co-precipitation from acidic aqueous solution, ferrihydrite has been observed to accept only up to ∼25 at.% Al without the formation of multi-phasic Al and Fe oxyhydroxides. Using basic chemistry and crystal-chemical relationships we propose here that the saturation limit of Al substitution in the structure of Fe oxyhydroxides is controlled by Al – Al avoidance in a manner that conforms to Pauling's distortion rule. Employing this hypothesis, we show that the predicted miscibility limit for Al incorporation is 25 at.% in ferrihydrite and 33 at.% in goethite, in agreement with previous observations. These results indicate that the classical f-phase model for ferrihydrite best represents observations. Incorrect assignment of Fe site occupancy and other shortcomings of the akdalaite/tohdite model for ferrihydrite are also discussed.

The risk of overfitting pair distribution function (PDF) data for highly defective material (Farrow et al., 2007) is illuminated with the example of the nanocrystalline hydrous ferric oxyhydroxide, ferrihydrite. Two structural models have been published by Michel et al. (2007, 2010) using this method, both of which contradict the standard ‘ferrihydrits’ model established by X-ray diffraction (Drits et al., 1993), and confirmed by single-crystal electron nanodiffraction (Janney et al., 2001) and neutron diffraction (Jansen et al., 2002). Although PDF data are reproduced equally well with the two regression models, neither model is realistic: the first (fhyd6) violates Pauling's 2nd rule, and the second (ferrifh), Pauling's 3rd rule.