We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter focuses on the legal challenges facing and the responses of Japanese local governments to the issue of hate speech. First, it explains the system of local autonomy in Japan and the right to enact local ordinances. It then outlines the previous efforts of local governments to curb discrimination and hate speech, including the recent notable Osaka City Ordinance Dealing with Hate Speech. A major feature of that ordinance is that it is, in substance, the only one among Japan’s laws and regulations that gives a detailed definition of ‘hate speech’. However, like the Hate Speech Elimination Act, the ordinance, does not prohibit hate speech. The chapter concludes by touching upon the kinds of challenges that local governments face when attempting to regulate hate speech. Not only are they required to reliably ascertain the legislative facts constituting the basis for the necessity and rationality of legislation, but also it seems that they have little choice but to adopt the least-restrictive means of regulating the issue and to revise those regulations while constantly checking to see whether their objective is being met.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.