We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Estates General of 1484 laid out a clear statement of commonwealth principles, largely followed by Charles VIII and Louis XII. Francis I, however, set out to undermine these commonwealth elements. With the Concordat of Bologna (1516), he gained the right to name successors to most French benefices, a tool kings would use as their most effective patronage weapon. The institutional thickening under Francis I and Henry II transformed the meaning of many traditional phrases. The regional noble elite and the legal hierarchy, led by the Parlements, developed mutually contradictory understandings of the “commonwealth” element of the monarchy. By the time of the Estates General of 1560, local elites wanted a codified return to a commonwealth whose principles had been effectively abandoned.At the Estates General of Orléans (1560–1561), they would lay out clearly a system built on elections: of bishops, abbots, priors, noble baillis, judges, town governments, and deputies to periodic meetings of bailiwick and national estates. The central judicial elite and the monarchy made sure this system never became operative. Together, the monarchy and the central judicial elite would develop a political vocabulary built around the “good of the State.”
As Bernardo Dovizi had said, as long as there was fighting in Italy, Piero was not without hope. So although the new year, 1498, opened with Piero enjoying ‘little reputation and less credit’, renewed fighting in Italy kept his hopes alive for the remaining years of his life.1 Two events helped to change the political scene, principally the succession of Louis of Orleans to the French throne in April, but also the execution of Savonarola the following month. With claims on Milan as well as Naples, King Louis XII forged new alliances in Italy, most notably with Venice and Pope Alexander VI, who used France to further his son Cesare Borgia’s attempts to build a state for himself in central Italy. The destabilisation they created encouraged Piero’s military adventurism, while the final unravelling of Savonarola’s life – his attack on the pope, his last defiant sermons and the aborted Trial by Fire in March and early April 1498 – also helped to revivify Piero by discrediting the Florentine government at home and abroad.2 So Piero’s little-known movements in these years provide a novel outside-in view of Florence’s crisis that helps to explain the threatened coup d’état in 1500 and the life Gonfaloniership two years later.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.