We examined inward rectification in Limulus ventral photoreceptors using the two-microelectrode voltage clamp. Hyperpolarization in the dark induced an inward current whose magnitude was distinctly dependent on extracellular K+ concentration, [K+0]. The [K+0] dependence resembled the characteristic [K+0] dependence of other inward rectifiers. The inward current was not dependent on extracellular Ca2+ or Na+, and it was unaffected by intracellular injection of Cl−. The hyperpolarization induced currents had two phases, an early nearly instantaneous phase and a slowly developing late phase. The currents were sensitive to extracellular barium and cesium. In voltage-pulse experiments, the magnitudes of the inwardly rectifying currents were variable from cell to cell, with some cells exhibiting negligible inward currents. Large hyperpolarizations (to membrane potentials more negative than about – 140 mV) caused unstable inward current recordings, irreversible desensitization, and irreversible elevation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration. The inward rectifier provides negative feedback by tending to depolarize the cell (with inward current) in response to hyperpolarization. We suggest that the inward rectifier reduces the amount of hyperpolarization that would otherwise be generated by electrogenic processes. This feature would restrict the dynamic voltage range of the photoreceptors at very hyperpolarized potentials.

The site of gamete interaction of electrophysiologically recorded Lytechinus variegatus eggs, fixed with osmium tetroxide (O5O4) and/or glutaraldehyde (GTA) at varying intervals after the onset of the increase in membrane conductance induced by an attached sperm, has been examined by high-voltage and conventional transmission electron microscopy. Although GTA and a GTA-O5O4 mixture iduced different electrical responses, specimens prepared with the two fixatives were ultrastructurally similar. In specimens observed within 5 s of the change in conductance, the acrosomal process projected through the vitelline layer and abutted the egg plasma membrane. A conspicuous layer of bindin surrounded the acrosomal process and connected the sperm to the egg's vitelline layer. In a fortuitous specimen fixed within 4 s following the change in conductance, the area of contact between the gamete plasma membranes possessed a trilaminar structure that separated the egg's and sperm's cytoplasms. The morphology of this area of contact was consistent with previously proposed intermediates of membrane fusion. Five to six seconds after the change in conductance, the sperm was connected to the egg via a narrow cytoplasmic bridge that consisted of the former acrosomal process and a projection of the egg cortex. The region of the bridge midway between the fused gametes was encircled by dense material that marked the site of sperm-egg fusion. Gamete interactions in which the activation potential was recorded (unclamped egg) were comparable in time and ultrastructure to events taking place in voltage-clamped eggs except for one major difference. Intact cortical granules (one to three) were observed beneath the tip of the incorporating sperm in unclamped eggs fixed following the onset of the activation potential, whereas all cortical granules dehisced in clamped eggs.

The physiological and morphological properties of color-opponent bipolar cells in the carp retina were studied. Fifty nine OFF-center bipolar cells and 63 ON-center bipolar cells out of about 500 total bipolar cells recorded showed color-opponent responses. The OFF-center color-opponent bipolar cells were classified into three subgroups according to their spectral and spatial responses. Fifty OFF-center color-opponent cells responded with depolarization to a blue light spot and with hyperpolarization to a red spot in the receptive-field center. The polarity of the surround response was opposite to that of center response at each wavelength. Therefore these cells were classified as OFF double-opponent cells (OFF-DO). Eight cells responded with hyperpolarization to a blue and green spot and with depolarization to a red spot. The surround responses of those cells were depolarizing at any wavelength (R+G− cell). One responded with hyperpolarization to a blue and red spot and with depolarization to a green spot. The surround response showed a different spectral characteristic from that of the center response. It responded with depolarization to a blue and green annulus and with hyperpolarization to a red annulus (R−G+B− cell). The ON-center color-opponent bipolar cells were similarly classified into three subgroups. Sixty of ON-center color-opponent cells were the double color-opponent type (ON-DO cell), showing the responses of opposite polarity to the OFF-DO cells. Two cells were classified as R−G+ cell, and one cell as R+G−B+ cell. Both OFF- and ON-DO cells were identified by their morphology as Cajal's giant bipolar cells, and R+G−, R−G+, R−G+B−, and R+G−B+ cells as Cajal's small bipolar cells. The analysis of the latency and the ionic mechanisms of their responses suggest that DO cells under light-adapted conditions receive direct inputs from long-wavelength (red) cones, RG cells from middle-wavelength (green) cones, and RGB cells from short-wavelength (blue) cones. Possible mechanisms of the opponent inputs to these bipolar cells are discussed.