We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The zones of glacially induced faults in Finland are portrayed by a number of discrete <10 km-long fault scarps, often forming multiple parallel segments and establishing longer glacially induced fault systems. A set of glacially induced fault systems further form glacially induced fault complexes, which may extend tens of kilometres cross-cutting glacial sediments. The systematic mapping has revealed 18 glacially induced fault systems forming 9 glacially induced fault complexes. The moment magnitude estimates for the earthquakes in Finnish Lapland are in the range of Mw ≈ 4.9–7.5. The detailed trenching across fault scarps provides evidence of non-stationary seismicity and occurrence of multiple slip events even before the Late Weichselian maximum.
Despite early studies indicating fault rupture both before and after deglaciation, it has long been hypothesized that glacially induced faults in Fennoscandia ruptured only once. The now widespread availability of high-resolution digital elevation models allows for testing this hypothesis by examining cross-cutting relationships between the scarps and both glacial and postglacial landforms. Although not widespread, such cross-cutting relationships indicate that segments of the Merasjärvi, Lainio and Pärvie faults have ruptured at least twice. The timing of the Merasjärvi ruptures is unknown; the Lainio ruptures occurred both before and after deglaciation, and at least one of the Pärvie ruptures is postglacial.
Additionally, it can be demonstrated that parallel segments of the Pärvie and Lansjärv faults ruptured at different times despite being only a few kilometres from each other. Given these results, the single rupture hypothesis must be reassessed for the high-relief scarps in northern Sweden, but it may still hold true for some of the low-relief scarps.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.