We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The identity of Jean-Baptiste Poquelin has challenged biographers from his own times to today. The diverse portrayal of Molière in the cinematic and televisual biographies reflects the challenges faced by scholars who have sought to interrogate and often fill in the gaps left by the absence of manuscripts and documents in Molière’s own hand. Early film biographies (particularly those by Léonce Perret (1909) and Jacques de Féraudy (1922)) gave an exemplary depiction of Molière as an actor/dramatist. The eulogistic tradition was undermined by Mnouchkine in 1978 in her collectivist view of Molière. The demythologising of the death of the dramatist by Robert Wilson in 1994 continues the subversion of legends accumulated during Molière’s time and through the afterlife industry. New mythologies have arisen through the big budget exploration in 2007 by Laurence Tirard of the period between Molière’s release from prison and his flight to the provinces: a period of biographical silence, but one that Tirard attempts to break with an imagined love affair that provides Molière with the inspiration for future characters and scenarios. A television film in 2009 fictionalising the current debate regarding authorship illustrates the trajectory in filmic biography of the deconstruction of a national icon.
Chapter 9 discusses the use of Plutarch in drama understood as a mode of political reflection. I provide a brief analysis of the political implications of Shakespeare’s (1564–1616) famous use of Plutarch in a series of plays devoted to key figures of the classical era. I explore how Shakespeare’s depiction of public life shifted between his first Roman play Titus Andronicus, deemed to have been written before his close study of North’s translations of Plutarch, and his latter plays focused on key Greek and Roman historical figures (Timon of Athens, Coriolanus, Julius Caesar and Antony and Cleopatra) for which his use of North is heavily documented and discussed. I then explore political themes and argument stemming from Plutarch and as relayed through Pierre Corneille’s (1606–1684) Pompée and Jean Racine’s (1639–1699) Mithridate.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.