Priapism is an abnormally prolonged erection, painful and irreducible, unrelated to sexual stimulation. Around 25-40% of cases are iatrogenic, especially associated with pharmacological treatments, of which antipsychotics (first and second generation) account for 50%.

The aim is to discuss a clinical case to provide further evidence.

The patient was a 37-year-old man with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who was admitted for clinical decompensation. He had stopped antipsychotic treatment three months earlier due to side effects. He reported previous episodes of priapism associated with Risperidone, Aripiprazole, Olanzapine, and Paliperidone. At admission, he was administered Asenapine 20mg with development of priapism. Treatment was stopped. The urologists performed a lavage of the corpora cavernosa and administered adrenaline. In the absence of effectiveness, surgical intervention was successfully performed. Given the psychopathological improvement, he was discharged without antipsychotic treatment and close follow-up.

He presented a new admission one month later. Amisulpride was prescribed up to 800mg/day with good evolution and no adverse effects.

Antipsychotic-induced priapism appears to be related to the blockade of alpha-1 adrenergic receptors in the corpora cavernosa. There is a positive correlation between the affinity for the receptor and the propensity to cause priapism. The dose and duration of the medication do not appear to be correlated. Other risk factors are a history of previous episodes, restarting medication after noncompliance, use of concomitant substances or medications that cause priapism. Our choice of amisulpride was based on the fact that it has no affinity for alpha-1 adrenergic receptors.

No significant relationships.

Priapism is a recognized complication of sickle cell anemia (SCA). When initial conventional treatments fail, simple or exchange blood transfusion has been advocated as a secondary intervention. However, recent literature suggests this may not be an effective therapy and may have significant neurologic sequelae. This paper reviews and summarizes the effectiveness and risks of blood transfusion compared with conventional priapism therapy.

All relevant papers identified from a MEDLINE search were systematically examined for data related to the use of blood transfusion in the setting of priapism due to SCA. The effectiveness of conventional therapy was compared with transfusion therapy using the outcome of “time to detumescence” (TTD). In addition, papers documenting adverse neurologic sequela were reviewed and summarized.

Forty-two case reports were identified containing complete information with regard to patient age and TTD. The mean TTD was 8.0 days with conventional therapy (n = 16) and 10.8 days with blood transfusion therapy (n = 26). Adverse neurologic sequelae from blood transfusion therapy was described in 9 cases, with long term outcomes ranging from complete resolution to severe residual deficits.

The current literature does not support the contention that blood transfusion is an effective therapy in the treatment of priapism due to SCA, as defined by an acceleration of TTD. In fact, numerous reports suggest that serious neurologic sequelae may result from this treatment. We feel the routine use of this therapy cannot be recommended.