We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter quantifies the emergence and institutionalisation of public petitioning on an unprecedented scale in terms of the numbers of issues, petitions, and signatures. The decisive breakthrough in terms of the volume of public petitions to the House of Commons occurred in the late 1820s and was driven by a series of mighty mobilisations including anti-slavery and parliamentary reform. The chronology of petitioning in the UK followed a similar pattern as elsewhere, but the volume of public petitions to the Commons was exceptional when placed in historical and comparative context. The data demonstrates that the volume of petitions and signatures was underpinned by organised mass campaigns, but also a ‘long tail’ of petitions on small and medium-scale issues. Comparing signatures with electoral data reveals that, for most nineteenth century, more people petitioned than voted in parliamentary elections. For all the well-documented vitality of episodic election rituals, this chapter demonstrates that petitions to Parliament were the most popular, regular means of interaction between subjects and politicians for much of this period.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.