The chapter will focus on the uses and abuses of Facebook and other social networks by Dark Tetrad personalities. In the first part, the importance and the uses of Facebook in modern life will be described. Then, the chapter will portray the benefits and potential harm inherent in Facebook. Next, theories that explain the attraction of Dark Triad personalities to Facebook will be presented. Chapter 3 will review the relationship between each Dark Tetrad personality and Facebook. The assumption is that each of the four personalities will have their habits relating to using Facebook. The chapter will also cover an important issue discussed in the literature-profiling Dark Tetrad personalities based on Facebook profiles and activities.

This concluding chapter takes stock of the ways in which the bioinformation governance landscape would look different if it were to embrace the picture of narrative identity impacts, interests, and responsibilities characterised and defended in this book. It proposes that information subjects’ identity-related interests in whether and how they encounter information about their bodies, biology, and health should be firmly installed amongst and routinely weighed alongside the other ethical concerns – such as protecting health, privacy, confidentiality, and autonomy. This does not mean that identity interests should invariably prevail over other ethical, practical, or legal considerations but that they should be afforded weight commensurate with the centrality of an inhabitable, embodied self-narrative to a full, flourishing, and practically engaged life. Mindful of what has been said about the ways in which identity impacts vary between information types and individual circumstances and thus the need for responsive rather than rigid disclosure policies and practices, this chapter proposes priorities for reform in five contexts in which ethical and legal debates about information access are currently pressing. These contexts are donor conception, including mitochondrial donation; return of individual research findings to participants; navigating confidentiality and consent in healthcare; direct-to-consumer genomics; and personal health-tracking devices.

This chapter offers a perspective on the long-running ethical debate about the nature and extent of responsibilities to return individually relevant research findings from health research to participants. It highlights the ways in which shifts in the research landscape are changing the roles of researchers and participants, the relationships between them, and what this might entail for the responsibilities owed towards those who contribute to research by taking part in it. It argues that a greater focus on the informational interests of participants is warranted and that, corollary to this, the potential value of findings beyond their clinical utility deserves greater attention. It proposes participants’ interests in using research findings in developing their own identities as a central example of this wider value and argues that these could provide grounds for disclosure.

Summarising the book's main research findings, Chapter 7 argues that while part of the explanation for the persistence of human rights problems in Turkey lies in endogenous political and social factors, the ECtHR's effectiveness has also been impeded by the ECHR system itself in two distinct ways. First, the ECtHR did not make full use of its review powers in overseeing Turkey. Second, Council of Europe members failed to resort to available sanctioning mechanisms due to Turkey's geostrategic importance. Kurdish legal mobilisation has been adversely affected by these endogenous and exogenous factors, as well as Kurdish lawyers’ failure to develop a collaborative litigation practice and tendency to favour professional politics over legal work. The chapter concludes with reflections on the book's research findings for academic scholarship and the ECtHR practice. Arguing that the effectiveness of supranational courts can best be measured on the basis of their actual impact on authoritarian regimes, the chapter concludes with a call for the revision of existing theories on the basis of empirical research on the ECtHR's engagement in countries such as Turkey, Russia, Poland and Hungary.