We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Mutual help programs are popular resources for persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and clinical referral to such programs is common. This chapter describes what is currently known about four established mutual help programs in the United States: Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), SMART Recovery, Women for Sobriety (WFS), and LifeRing. Strong correlational research indicates that AA is associated with increased abstinence and that this association arises in part because of increased social support, abstinence self-efficacy, and spiritual practices. There is little support that reductions in anger, selfishness, and depression account for AA-related benefit. Preliminary evidence indicates that persons reporting lower religiosity and higher education are more likely to affiliate with non-AA mutual help programs and that these programs may be efficacious. A series of recommendations are made to advance our knowledge of these mutual help programs, with an emphasis on the need for future investigations of SMART, WFS, and LifeRing.
The complexity of addiction has led to the emergence of free community-based peer-led resources for their management, which have grown substantially in many countries to help initiate and sustain recovery-related changes. This chapter highlights the similarities and differences between these mutual help organisations (MHOs; also referred to as mutual-aid or self-help groups), such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), Narcotics Anonymous and other 12-step-based entities, as well as newer entities, such as SMART Recovery, LifeRing, Women for Sobriety and Celebrate Recovery. The chapter begins by outlining the different major MHOs and reviewing the scientific research conducted on them pertaining to recovery benefits; the mechanisms of behaviour change through which they are purported, and have been shown, to convey benefits; and the potential for healthcare cost reductions and cost effectiveness. In the final section commonalities among these ostensibly different MHOs are described and future directions are discussed.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.