Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 29 - Reading Scottsboro Limited in the Era of Black Lives Matter

  • from Part III - Afterlives
  • Edited by Vera M. Kutzinski, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, Anthony Reed, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
  • Book:
    Langston Hughes in Context
    Published online:
    10 November 2022
    Print publication:
    24 November 2022, pp 308-318

  • Summary

    The court trials of the Scottsboro Nine, young African Americans falsely accused of raping two young white women, galvanized a generation and helped precipitate Hughes’s leftward shift. In 1931, he published Scottsboro Limited: Four Poems and a Play in Verse, collecting an eponymous play and the poems “The Town of Scottsboro,” “Justice,” “Scottsboro,” and “Christ in Alabama” alongside images by Prentiss Taylor. Its themes – the lethal policing of a racially and economically vulnerable group – no less than the conflicts among different factions surrounding the trial, seem tailor-made to contemporary concerns. This chapter reads Hughes and Taylor together to shift the focus from the prospect of death to imprisonment itself as unjust. Then it asks what it means that its poems circulate as memes, absent their original context, to protest the seemingly endless instances of judicial and extrajudicial, state-sanctioned murder. If the question of a grievable death has taken on renewed urgency since 2014, Hughes’s Scottsboro writing urges readers to reconsider what we collectively recognize as death.