We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 7 begins the second, “Narratives,” half of The Making of Song Dynasty History, and defines and explains the historical evolution of the “grand allegory” of Song history. As a prelude to this discussion, this chapter explains how this allegorical narrative originated in a distinctively Confucian political discourse that began in the mid-eleventh century and matured over the course of the dynasty. It focuses on “precedents” (gushi) and their relation to the “policies of the ancestors” (zuzong zhi fa). “Precedents” were an important tool in the rhetorical arsenal of Song policy makers and a vital component of Song political discourse. In brief, a “precedent” invoked a prior historical event as justification for a proposed present course of political action. Although “precedents” could be cited from any earlier period, increasingly, as the dynasty progressed, “precedents” came from Song (post-960) history. The most politically useful of these evolved into a collection of actual but often quasi-historical events that came to be known as the “policies of the ancestors.” Both official and private compilations of these “precedents” circulated and came to constitute an unofficial corpus of events that were held to reflect the dynasty’s positive political values. Ensuing chapters deconstruct the “grand allegory” into three thematic clusters, all of which derive from this political discourse and its recourse to such “precedents.”
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.