We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
William J. Brady, University of Virginia,Mark R. Sochor, University of Virginia,Paul E. Pepe, Metropolitan EMS Medical Directors Global Alliance, Florida,John C. Maino II, Michigan International Speedway, Brooklyn,K. Sophia Dyer, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Massachusetts
Civil unrest or terrorism at mass gathering events can erupt with significant violence and multiple casualties. These are high-risk situations, not only because of physical casualties, but also because of ethical, political and psychological sequelae. Beyond specialized planning, multi-agency drills and proficient tactical medicine training, medical teams should co-create secured access and egress, alternative medical responses and rapidly-adapting coordination and secure communications with other agencies. Civil protests can escalate, especially when extremist groups infiltrate them. Multi-site violence and assaults can evolve, particularly in terroristic attacks. Key lessons include unrelenting vigilance until all participants have left the mass gathering scene in its entirety. Violence (bombs, shootings, vehicle attacks) will often erupt when mass gatherings are dispersing and considered over. Terrorists can also purposely target medical personnel or incite one event (fire, bomb, shooting) to create crushing stampedes or to herd crowds into more vulnerable areas where they can be further attacked more directly with other modern weapons. Terrorists often attack from elevated perches or generate “protracted suicide” incidents while holding hostages, including many severely-wounded. The resulting frustration, anger and guilt commonly can consume medical rescuers when beholding slaughtered innocents or simply because they were (appropriately) staged during containment of on-going violence.
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) routinely stage in a secure area in response to active shooter incidents until the scene is declared safe by law enforcement. Due to the time-sensitive nature of injuries at these incidents, some EMS systems have adopted response tactics utilizing law enforcement protection to expedite life-saving medical care.
Objective
Describe EMS provider perceptions of preparedness, adequacy of training, and general attitudes toward active shooter incident response after completing a tactical awareness training program.
Methods
An unmatched, anonymous, closed-format survey utilizing a five-point Likert scale was distributed to participating EMS providers before and after a focused training session on joint EMS/police active shooter rescue team response. Descriptive statistics were used to compare survey results. Secondary analysis of responses based on prior military or tactical medicine training was performed using a chi-squared analysis.
Results
Two hundred fifty-six providers participated with 88% (225/256) pretraining and 88% (224/256) post-training surveys completed. Post-training, provider agreement that they felt adequately prepared to respond to an active shooter incident changed from 41% (92/225) to 89% (199/224), while agreement they felt adequately trained to provide medical care during an active shooter incident changed from 36% (82/225) to 87% (194/224). Post-training provider agreement that they should never enter a building with an active shooter changed from 73% (165/225) to 61% (137/224). Among the pretraining surveys, significantly more providers without prior military or tactical experience agreed they should never enter a building with an active shooter until the scene was declared safe (78% vs 50%, P = .002), while significantly more providers with prior experience felt both adequately trained to provide medical care in an active shooter environment (56% vs 31%, P = .007) and comfortable working jointly with law enforcement within a building if a shooter were still inside (76% vs 56%, P = .014). There was no difference in response to these questions in the post-training survey.
Conclusions
Attitudes and perceptions regarding EMS active shooter incident response appear to change among providers after participation in a focused active shooter response training program. Further studies are needed to determine if these changes are significant and whether early EMS response during an active shooter incident improves patient outcomes.
JonesJ, KueR, MitchellP, EblanG, DyerKS. Emergency Medical Services Response to Active Shooter Incidents: Provider Comfort Level and Attitudes Before and After Participation in a Focused Response Training Program. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(4):1-7.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.