We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
There is a high prevalence of low back pain and neck pain in Canada, and a large proportion can be treated without spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We hypothesized that there is overuse of lumbar and cervical spine MRI. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of appropriate, possibly appropriate, and inappropriate MRI requests for low back pain and neck pain.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective observational study in the electromyography (EMG) clinic in Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke. All ambulatory cases of low back pain or neck pain who had an EMG evaluation and a request of lumbar and/or cervical spine MRI between March 1, 2018, and May 31, 2018, were analyzed. One hundred and twenty MRI orders were classified as appropriate, possibly appropriate, and inappropriate according to the interactive decision support guide of Institut National d’Excellence en Santé et Services Sociaux for optimal use of MRI.
Results:
Sixty-three requests (53%) were classified as inappropriate, with a higher proportion in the cervical group (34 (64%)) than the lumbar group (28 (43%)). Appropriate and possibly appropriate requests were 19 (16%) and 38 (31%), respectively. The subgroup with an MRI ordered within 90 days of symptom onset had a similar proportion of inappropriate use.
Interpretation:
Our study demonstrates that despite recommendations against ordering spine MRI in low back pain or neck pain without red flags, there is an overuse of this imaging modality in our region, contributing to the delay in MRI access for appropriate indications.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.