A basic feature of human evaluative conditioning
is that the reported acquired valence of a previously neutral
conditioned stimulus (CS) that has been paired with a valenced
unconditioned stimulus (US), is resistant to extinction.
The present study investigated whether startle modulation,
sometimes presented as an index of acquired valence, reflected
this basic feature. In a differential fear conditioning
paradigm (n = 38) with an electrocutaneous stimulus
as the US, a strong extinction manipulation was conducted
by removing the US-electrodes and by extended extinction
trials. At the end of extinction, the results corroborated
previous findings of evaluative conditioning in that the
reported valence for CS+ was still more negative than for
CS−, despite disappearance of the differential skin
conductance responses. However, startle modulation did
not show resistance-to-extinction. Results were discussed
in terms of recent conceptualizations of extinction.