We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Modern gynaecology has witnessed a rapid evolution and a widespread application of endoscopic techniques over the past 20 years, particularly those seen in hysteroscopy. This has been made possible mainly due to technological developments relating to instrumentation and equipment, along with continuous improvements related to surgical techniques. The advances in technology and techniques, have made hysteroscopy less painful, less invasive and an outpatient procedure . Together with transvaginal ultrasound it provides the gold standard for diagnosis of uterine pathology.
Hysteroscopy enlarges the diagnostic capacity by minor surgical operative procedures like removal of IUD, biopsy or removal of polyps and minor synechiolysis.
This chapter provides a description of basic hysteroscopic procedures including simple operative procedures like second- and third-generation endometrial ablation and grade 0 to grade 1 myomectomy for small myomas.
The improvements in techniques, endoscopic instrumentation and surgical experience have completely changed the approach to uterine intracavitary pathologies, allowing the physician to achieve more reliable diagnostic and therapeutic results. The advent of these new technologies allows us today to improve advanced hysteroscopic surgery by increasing the efficacy of an operating room environment but avoiding the need for the inpatient setting for most of the procedures. It is possible to treat severe cervical stenosis or intrauterine synechiae, including Asherman’s syndrome, G2 myomas, congenital uterine malformations, adenomyosis and chronically retained products of conception in an ambulatory setting. The future looks to further the simplification of instrumentation, and establish a safer and easier delivery of energy sources.
This chapter provides a description of advanced hysteroscopic procedures and their benefits in modern gynaecological practice.
To compare combined conventional Freer medialisation and controlled synechiae, performed for middle meatal access (during the initial steps of functional endoscopic sinus surgery) and post-operative middle turbinate medialisation, with basal lamella relaxing incision, the latter of which is a single step for achieving both middle meatal access and post-operative medialisation. The study also compared the effects of controlled synechiae and basal lamella relaxing incision on post-operative olfaction.
Method
A randomised prospective study was performed on 52 nasal cavity sides (32 patients). Only basal lamella relaxing incision was performed in one group, and both conventional medialisation and controlled synechiae were performed in the other. Intra-operative and post-operative photography was used to measure the middle meatal area. A pocket smell test was used to assess olfaction.
Results
There were no significant differences in operative middle meatal access and post-operative medialisation of the middle turbinate. Post-operative olfaction was affected more in the combined conventional medialisation and controlled synechiae group, compared to the basal lamella relaxing incision group, but this finding was not statistically significant.
Conclusion
Basal lamella relaxing incision is an effective single-step technique for achieving adequate middle meatal access and post-operative medialisation, with no significant effect on olfaction.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.