We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter examines the historiographical depiction of Mukhtar b. Abi ‘Ubayd in the period between 61/681 and 67/687. It identifies four primary interpretive frameworks that pervade historical depictions of Mukhtar. The first framework highlights tensions between Arab tribal elites and non-Arabs (both clients and slaves) with Mukhtar representing the demands of non-Arab populations systematically denied status and financial benefits. The second centers on the religious dimensions of Mukhtar’s rebellion often equating his supporters with the Shi‘a. Some historians openly dispute the sincerity of Mukhtar’s religious claims, particularly his calls for avenging the family of the Prophet. The third interpretive framework places Mukhtar’s revolt within a broader regional struggle between the Umayyads in Syria and the Zubayrids in the ?ijaz. The fourth and final interpretive framework integrates Mukhtar into larger propagandist narratives that center on other historical figures or movements. The chapters finds no discernible differences between historical sources based on their genre (chronography vs. prosopography vs. biography).
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.