We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Organisms may compete for a great variety of limiting resources, such as food and habitat and, in the case of plants, light and pollinators. Direct mechanisms of competition, as highlighted by interactions between yellow crazy ants and hermit crabs on Tokelau, include resource and interference competition, while indirect mechanisms of competition that are mediated by other species are also widespread in ecological communities. Introductions of species into novel environments allow ecologists to study competitive interactions in real time. Interspecific competition can lead to competitive exclusion when two or more species occupy similar niches. A variable environment, niche shift, and niche partitioning can promote species coexistence. Theoretical models, such as the Lotka–Volterra competition model, help identify conditions in which two or more competing species can coexist. When conservation ecologists introduce two or more species as biological control agents, they must consider potential competitive interactions among the introduced species, keeping in mind the factors that promote the coexistence of the introduced species.
Whereas most books emphasize cases of expansion, this chapter focuses on cases in which the United States does not expand. These cases - Fiji, Kiribati, Tahiti, Tokelau, and Tuvalu- challenge grand narratives of America’s path in the Pacific. The islands had strategic value, large markets, and souls to save. Yet, there was little if any interest from the US government in annexation. Using a structured, focused comparison, we attribute these instances of non-expansion to three causes: an island lacks commodities or labor for the entrepreneur to exploit; the entrepreneur dies or is arrested before the imperial lobby matures; or the entrepreneur establishes themselves in territories already controlled by foreign empires who can offer protection from local threats. These cases are interesting, brief stories about the American commercial experience abroad that have been ignored by scholars of American imperialism.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.