We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This study aimed to report on the UK rate of surgical voice restoration usage and investigate the factors that influence its uptake.
Method
A national multicentre audit of people with total laryngectomy was completed over a six-month period (March to September 2020) in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This study is a secondary analysis of the data collected, focusing on the primary communication methods used by people with total laryngectomy.
Results
Data on surgical voice restoration were available for 1196 people with total laryngectomy; a total of 852 people with total laryngectomy (71 per cent) used surgical voice restoration. Another type of communication method was used by 344 people. The factors associated with surgical voice restoration in the multiple regression analysis were sex (p = 0.003), employment (employed vs not employed, p < 0.001) and time post-laryngectomy (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
This study provides an important benchmark for the current status of surgical voice restoration usage across the UK. It found that 71 per cent of people with total laryngectomy used surgical voice restoration as their primary communication method.
To demonstrate a simple, practical, cheap method of preventing potentially fatal aspiration of a dislodged voice prosthesis; this method was developed by a laryngectomised patient.
Case report:
A patient diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx underwent total laryngectomy. Upon completion of radiotherapy, a tracheoesophageal fistula was created and a voice prosthesis inserted to enable voice restoration. Unfortunately, the patient presented subsequently with repeated episodes of dislodgement and an episode of potentially fatal aspiration of the voice prosthesis, despite various measures taken by the surgeons to overcome the problem. The patient subsequently developed a method enabling him to retrieve the voice prosthesis himself should it become dislodged. He attached a ring to the prosthesis, which was larger in diameter than the tracheal stoma, thus preventing ingestion or recurrence of aspiration.
Conclusion:
To our knowledge, this is the first report in the world literature of this form of innovation, created by a laryngectomised patient, to overcome the problem of aspiration or ingestion of a dislodged voice prosthesis.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.