The organization of the retina of the turtle species Mauremys caspica, found in fresh water ponds of Israel, has been examined by light microscopical techniques including examination of fresh wholemount retina, one micron blue-stained vertical sections and Golgi-stained material. The anatomical findings on Mauremys retina have been compared with those of the Pseudemys retina (Kolb, 1982) which is more commonly used for electrophysiological and neurochemical studies in the USA. The photoreceptors of Mauremys are similar in type and oil droplet content to Pseudemys photoreceptors except for the double cone in Mauremys. This cone type appears more abundant than in Pseudemys and the principal member contains a yellow oil droplet instead of an orange oil droplet. Golgi staining reveals that all the cell types that have been seen in Pseudemys are found in Mauremys with identical morphology. In addition, two amacrine cell types that were not before described for Pseudemys have been added to the classification. One of these is the tristratified dopaminergic amacrine cell described in immunocytochemical studies (Witkovsky et al., 1984; Nguyen-Legros et al., 1985; Kolb et al., 1987). We have used these anatomical studies on Pseudemys and Mauremys retina to form a catalogue of neural types for the turtle retina in general. We conclude with an attempt to combine findings from anatomy, electrophysiology, and neurochemistry to form an overview of the organization of this reptilian retina.

The distribution of glycine receptors in the turtle retina was studied with the aid of a monoclonal antibody that detects the 93-kD protein associated with the strychnine-sensitive glycine receptor. Light microscopically, receptors were found in the inner plexiform layer and, more sparsely, in the innermost parts of the inner nuclear layer. No receptors were seen to be associated with photoreceptor cells, horizontal cells, or any other structures in the distal inner nuclear layer or outer plexiform layer. Ultrastructurally, glycine receptors were found on the inner face of postsynaptic membranes of processes from amacrine and presumed ganglion cells and always involved amacrine cell processes as the presynaptic element. Such glycine receptor immunoreactive synapses onto amacrine cell processes were distributed throughout the inner plexiform layer with a peak density near the middle. On the other hand, output synapses onto ganglion cell processes displaying immunoreactive glycine receptor sites showed a bimodal distribution in the inner plexiform layer. Glycine receptor immunoreactivity was not detected on bipolar cells, but presumed glycine-utilizing processes (i.e. those presynaptic to immunoreactive glycine receptors) were occasionally found to be postsynaptic in bipolar cell dyads. The majority of the synaptic input to the presumed glycine-utilizing amacrine cell processes was from other amacrine processes, some of which were themselves glycine utilizing. The observations suggest that glycinergic synapses in the turtle retina are, to a large extent, engaged in processing interamacrine signals.

In the turtle retina, dopamine has been observed in a small population of amacrine cells. Whereas the effect of dopamine has been intensively studied, knowledge about the release of this transmitter and the neuronal control of its release are still poorly understood. We therefore decided to study the release of endogenous dopamine. Isolated retinas were superfused with Ringer’s solutions and stimulated with increased potassium, light, or drugs which interfere with neurotransmitter systems. Dopamine was analyzed by using aluminum-oxide extraction and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrochemical detection. Increased potassium (25 mM) caused a five-fold increase in the basal release. When calcium was replaced by cobalt, no increase was induced by 25 mM potassium. Flickering light increased the basal release of endogenous dopamine by a factor of three. The effect of flickering light was greater in the presence of additional steady background illumination. Kainate (10 μM), an agonist for excitatory amino acids, doubled the basal dopamine release. Bicuculline (10 μM), a γ-amino butyric acid (GABA) antagonist, increased the release to about six times the basal level. Naloxone (10 μM), an opiate antagonist, increased the release to eight times the basal level. These findings suggest that dopamine is released from amacrine cells in the turtle retina in a calcium-dependent manner, which is most likely a vesicular release. Dopamine release is induced by flickering light vs. darkness and vs. steady background illumination. A moderate background illumination alone does not significantly increase basal dopamine release. Drug treatment during the release experiments suggests that dopaminergic neurons receive an excitatory input either directly or indirectly from glutamatergic bipolar and/or amacrine cells and inhibitory inputs either directly or indirectly from GABAergic amacrine cells and from enkephalinergic amacrine cells or efferent fibers.

We obtained intracellular recordings from transient, On–Off amacrine and ganglion cells of the turtle retina. We tested the ability of neurotransmitter agonists and antagonists to modify the responses to light stimuli. The metabotropic glutamate agonist, 2-amino-phosphonobutyric acid (APB), selectively blocked On responses, whereas the amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-proprionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist, GYKI, blocked both On and Off responses. Although GYKI appeared to block excitation completely, suggesting an absence of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-mediated responses, it was found that in the presence of ionotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) blockers, the excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) was prolonged. The late component of the EPSP was blocked by the NMDA antagonist, D-2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acid (D-AP5). Picrotoxin (PTX) and bicuculline (BCC) induced a mean hyperpolarization of −6.4 mV, suggesting a direct effect of GABA on transient amacrine and ganglion cells, since antagonism of a GABA-mediated inhibition of release of glutamate by bipolars would depolarize third-order neurons. The acetylcholine agonist, carbachol, or the nicotinic agonist, epibatidine, depolarized all On–Off neurons. This action was blocked by d-tubocurarine. Cholinergic inputs to On–Off neurons increase their excitability without altering the pattern of light responsiveness.

Lateral voltage spread in electrically coupled retinal horizontal cell networks is the substrate of center-surround antagonism in bipolar and ganglion cells. We studied its spatial and temporal properties in more detail in turtle L1 horizontal cells by using a contrast border as light stimulus. Experimental data were contrasted with expectations from a linear continuum model to specify the impact of nonlinearities. The assumptions for the diffusion term of the continuum model were justified by neurobiotin labeling. Measured voltage spread revealed two different length constants Λ+ and Λ0, under illuminated and nonilluminated regions of the retina, respectively, as predicted by the linear model. Length constants in the illuminated region showed strong temporal dynamics. For the initial phase of the horizontal cell responses Λ+ was larger than Λo. This was also in accordance with the model. Right at the peak of the response, however, Λ+ dropped below Λo and did not change any more. It is this temporal reversal of asymmetry in voltage spread and not the decrease of Λ+ itself that is lacked by the linear model. The observed independence of the mean ratio Λ+/Λo from light intensity in both the peak and the plateau phases of horizontal cell responses contradicts the linear assumption, too. These two effects have to be addressed to local nonlinearities in the horizontal cell network like a negative feedback loop from photoreceptors and/or voltage-dependent conductances. Due to the failure of the linear model, firm conclusions about the membrane resistance and the coupling resistance of the horizontal cell network cannot be drawn from length constant measurements.

Recent physiological experiments support behavioral and morphological evidence for a fourth type of cone in the turtle retina, maximally sensitive in the ultraviolet (UV). This cone type has not yet been included in the models proposed for connectivity between cones and horizontal cells. In this study, we examined the inputs of UV, S, M, and L cones to horizontal cells. We used the high-resolution Dynamic Constant Response Method to measure the spectral sensitivity of horizontal cells without background light and after adaptation to UV, blue (B), green (G), and red (R) light. We concluded the following: (1) Tetrachromatic input to a Y/B horizontal cell was identified. The spectral-sensitivity curves of the cell in three of the adaptation conditions were well represented by L-, M-, and S-cone functions. Adaptation to blue light revealed a peak at 372 nm, the same wavelength location as that determined behaviorally in the turtle. A porphyropsin template could be closely fitted to the sensitivity band in that region, strong evidence for input from a UV cone. (2) The spectral-sensitivity functions of R/G horizontal cells were well represented by the L- and M-cone functions. There was no indication of UV- or S-cone inputs into these cells. (3) The spectral sensitivities of the monophasic horizontal cells were dominated by the L cone. However, the shape of the spectral-sensitivity function depended on the background wavelength, indicating secondary M-cone input. Connectivity models of the outer retina that predict input from all cone types are supported by the finding of tetrachromatic input into Y/B horizontal cells. In contrast, we did not find tetrachromatic input to R/G and monophasic horizontal cells. Chromatic adaptation revealed the spectral-sensitivity function of the turtle UV cone peaking at 372 nm.

To study processing of UV stimuli in the retina of the turtle, Trachemys dorbignii, we recorded intracellular responses to spectral light from 89 cells: 54 horizontal (47 monophasic, five (R/G) biphasic and two (Y/B) triphasic), 14 bipolar, 12 amacrine, and nine ganglion cells. Spectral sensitivities were measured with monochromatic flashes or with the dynamic constant response method in dark or chromatic adapted states. Stray light and second-order harmonics were also measured. (1) All cells responded to UV stimuli, although none had maximum sensitivity in the UV. (2) Most horizontal, bipolar, and amacrine cells had red-peaked spectral sensitivities. (3) Red adaptation of all monophasic horizontal cells indicated a single red input, except one that had additional peaks in the blue and UV. (4) Responses of biphasic and triphasic horizontal cells to UV light were always hyperpolarizing. Opposition between hyperpolarizing and depolarizing responses at long wavelengths indicates that UV responses were not due to the beta band of red receptors. (5) An unstained spectrally opponent bipolar cell hyperpolarized in the center to green light and antagonistically depolarized in the surround to UV, blue, and green flashes, but hyperpolarized to red. (6) All dark-adapted amacrine cells were red-peaked monophasic cells, but red adaptation broadened their spectral-sensitivity curves or displaced their peaks. An A15, an A18, and an A24 wide-field amacrine cell were stained. (7) A G15 bistratified ganglion cell is shown here for the first time to be spectrally opponent. This UVB/RG cell depolarized to UV and blue and hyperpolarized to red and green. It differs from previously reported turtle ganglion cells in being color opponent in the entire field, not only in the surround, and in showing spatial opponency.