We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter introduces Newton’s intellectual biography before the publication of the Principia, and provides a new account of his methods as a natural philosopher. From the 1660s onwards, Newton – in line with his mentor Isaac Barrow and with other mixed mathematicians discussed in I.1 – sought a phenomenological science of properties, actively disdaining conjecture concerning the underlying causes of phenomena. The famous ‘De gravitatione’ manuscript is shown to stem from hydrostatical lectures delivered in 1671; contrary to most of the literature, it contains no elaborate metaphysics of divine omnipresence. Newton’s interest in revealed theology developed when he had to perform disputations in 1677; he did not become an antitrinitarian until the late-1680s, and there is no evidence that his theological views influenced the Principia. For all its mathematical sophistication, that work was very much the product of a methodology not much different from that which mixed mathematicians had been advocating for the previous century. In particular, Newton’s ideas at this time bear a strong conceptual resemblance to those developed by other English mixed mathematicians, such as John Wallis. The very first ‘Newtonians’ recognised the anti-metaphysical thrust of his ideas.
This appendix provides mathematical details to supplement the ideas presented in the main text. Topic covered include: angular measurement, apparent diameter, trigonometry, finding the Sun’s altitude from the length of a shadow, determining the relative distances of the Sun and Moon, and finding the distance to an astronomical object using parallax measurements. In addition, this appendix shows how to calculate the sizes of epicycles in the Ptolemaic theory and the periods and sizes of planetary orbits in the Copernican theory. Mathematical details are also provided for Kepler’s Laws of Planetary Motion, Galileo’s measurement of mountains on the Moon, Galileo’s studies of falling bodies and projectiles, Newton’s universal gravitational force, and Bradley’s theory of the aberration of starlight.
In 1671 Robert Hooke thought he had detected an annual parallax for the star Gamma Draconis, thus proving that the Earth orbits the Sun. Setting aside the uncertainty of Hooke’s meagre measurements, there remained the problem of how the Earth could orbit the Sun. Hooke thought he knew: the planets orbited the Sun because of a combination of straight line inertial motion and an attraction toward the Sun. But it was left to Hooke’s rival, Isaac Newton, to work out the mathematical details. While working out these details Newton established an entirely new physics based on three fundamental laws of motion and a universal gravitational attraction between all massive objects. Newton’s physics explained not only the orbits of planets, but also the motion of projectiles, the orbits of the Moon and comets, the precession of the equinoxes, and the tides. Newton’s physics was hailed in England but many European natural philosophers initially dismissed universal gravitational attraction as an “occult quality.”
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.